Amazon are now offering the “next generation” gizmo a lightweight electronic reading device called Kindle. Apart from the fact that the screen flashes black on every page turn, and takes two seconds to load each page, and has some DRM issues, as the reviews by users at amazon.com themselves forlornly admit; does no-one else think that this is kind of souless?
The immense pleasure in paper, opening the book, smelling the book even(!), carefully preserving the spine and dust covers and building a library over the years that tells a life story?
That can now be replaced by a push button.
[I do think this is useful installed at airports and at Starbucks for newspapers and magazines, but as a way of owning books, no thanks.]
I love real books, and so do my children. I used to spend wonderful mornings as a geeky teenager in the book shops on the Charing Cross in London loving every minute. They have all gone, beaten out by huge conglomerates. As a business thinker I admire the strategic efficiency and clout, but as a human being I mourn the lovely sensation of serendipity of finding an old 19th century leather-bound edition of Tennyson, or a wine list from the 1940s, or old Hotspurs, and Beanos (The heyday of British comics), or just that good novel that I never got round to reading in the 5p pile.
What’s next for publishers? Is this a symptom? Is it really good-bye books? I don’t think so, but I think it is a trend. Already libraries are buying e-books rather than books. Now publishers would make lots of money - no print or distribution costs - and libraries will become a thing of the past. They’ll say they won’t of course, but eventually…
The more paranoid will see a conspiracy. I see an attempt by Amazon to reduce logistics and stock - but when and why do we accept the social cost? I like paper, it’s organic, cellulose, and beautiful. I also live in Sweden where paper matters to companies like Södra.
I would also argue the neurological event of reading and the memory process are curtailed. Further, I can’t give the book to a friend, I can’t take out from the shelf a vloume a once baby chewed on (!) and I’d never hold a wonderful oversized colour atlas again, and that’s a thing of immense beauty.
And beauty will be gone, for on Kindle all books will become the same size. No special bindings, or bookmarks, no dog-eared interruptions, or books with watermarks, and flyleafs, tracing paper, and watercolours, and jammy fingers that bring smiles of memories of midnight snacks, torches, and childhood. More than that, I fear that books, the absolute pinnacle of human learning and the repository of thought and ideas, laughter, sorrow, and wisdom will become just another commercial commodity. I wouldn’t even want a Kindle for the train or the beach, and yes, I get that I can get thousands of books that I can’t get in a bookstore - but for me that’s hardly the point.
My suggestion to Amazon would be to emphasize that printed books will continue to be the number one way of enjoying reading; and to bundle the book and electronic version together for a dollar more (As in buy two get one free) for those who want that. Me, no thanks. You, maybe both? Maybe just Kindle?
Just think this though, every purchase or read of an electronic book, somewhere a printed book dies. The logic of the strategic model might be that we really are meant to lose most printed books to an electronic e-book format over the next 50 years…So kindle or kindling? You judge.
For me every real book is a wonderful testament to human freedom - I run my hand across my bookshelf from Beatrix Potter to Essays On Exchange Rates: Deterministic Chaos and Technical Analysis on my bookshelf and feel a lifetime of memories…The loss of that seems to my way of thinking as bad as losing childhood itself…Or am I wrong?